Our objective for task one was to create a working application and pitch it to our tutors. The group decided to create a university application, allowing students on the same course to connect and introduce themselves prior to the course starting, taking inspiration from Unite Students, an application in the same field of motives but focusing on accommodation. Â

This essay will aim to discuss invisible technologies, relating to media ecology suggesting âtechnology and techniques, modes of information and codes of communication play a leading role in human affairsâ (Gamaleri, G 2019). This essay will focus on the issues of big corporations such as Google and Facebook. Â

In todayâs era, it seems as though technologies and societies are integrated in complex circuits of interactions and relationships that therefore makes it impossible to isolate from one another. We now push a lot of reliance onto technology, with Berners-Lee suggesting that the integration of connectivity and digital services would bring âthe workings of society closer to the workings of our mindsâ (2000: 6).
By the end of 2011, almost half a billion âsmartphonesâ had been shipped in the world (MobiThinking, 2012). Scholars claim that âadded to the previously purchased smartphones, this meant that there was a total of around 1.1 billion smartphones in use by the end of 2011â (Bredican J and Vigar-Ellis, D 2014), suggesting the rise in technology was enormous and ever increasing, seen as an easier way to communicate with people as well as use these phones in their everyday routines. Itâs proposed that people predominantly use social media to âcommunicate, look for events, notice stores and brands and find the weather. Itâs how people are aided in their daily lifeâ (Loewen, J 2018). The development of more operating systems such as software, materials, mobile phones and applications themselves has enabled technology to be the driving force in todayâs society, having a vast impact on our day to day lives, with ever-growing responsibilities and reliance on technology.
A recent example of the reliance would be the likes of Google going offline, sparking an outrage from its users (Hern, A 2020). What should be noted is that the development in technology is shown with this issue, as not only did it affect peopleâs emails, it affected their living as well with people complaining on social media of âbeing unable to switch off some lights in their homesâ (Cellan-Jones, R. 2020). This shows how technology is no longer just applications for communicating, as earlier stated it is now a technique and a new way of living for the majority. This example is not the first, and potentially wonât be the last, as with technology comes the risk of systems crashing, most likely due to the number of users it faces. Â
Furthermore, people are considered above all as consumers and the âmarkets’. âPeople believe that fast is better than slow, that new is better than old, that more is better than less; and, if people canât get this, then they are forced to rethink the meaning of the word âbetterâ(Gamaleri, G 2019), representing that people expect the best due to promotion from companies offering no less than this, then leading to an outrage when a system goes down. Â
Â
As much as technology development is convenient, there are some examples of how âtechnology is making our minds redundantâ (Foer, F 2017). His example was Facebook deceives their users without them knowing due to the invisibility of this technology. Foer expresses that âFacebook is always surveilling users, always auditing them, using them as lab rats in its behavioral experimentsâ (2017). Â
This suggests that Facebook creates the impression of free will when using their application, when it actually âpaternalistically nudges users in the direction it deems best for them, which also happens to be the direction that gets them thoroughly addictedâ (Foer, F 2017).This expresses the idea of Facebook tactically using the rise of social media to their advantage in order to have more users on their social media. It begs the question of if they are wanting users to use the application for themselves, or if Facebook is in fact using it for their own advantages. However, Annette Baier argued that trust can only exist in relationships where there is a possibility for betrayal, and that we cannot truly form trust relationships with technology because technology cannot âbetrayâ us in the exact sense of the word (Baier, 1986). Technology does disappoint us but does not betray us like people do, suggesting people will still continue to use these technologies as they see the problems as an easy fix. Â
In conclusion, invisible technologies are socially depended on, with the majority of people taking them for granted due to the ease of them. As much as they have glitches, our world is now digital. Due to us not seeing this technology, it could be considered that technology owns us, rather than us owning technology, therefore reiterating an earlier point of Facebook making it’s consumers vulnerable. Technology may no longer be seen as a way to enhance intelligence, but a trend we buy into, and will continue to buy into as it develops for centuries to come.
REFERENCES
- A. Hammershøj, A. Sapuppo and R. Tadayoni, “Challenges for mobile application development,” 2010 14th International Conference on Intelligence in Next Generation Networks, Berlin, 2010, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1109/ICIN.2010.5640893.Â
- Baier, A. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96(2), 231â260. https:// doi.org/10.1086/292745Â Â
- Berners-Lee, T., Hall, W., & Hendler, J. A. (2006). A framework for web science. Now Publishers Inc.Â
- Cellan-Jones, R. (2020). Google outage: YouTube, Docs and Gmail knocked offline. Retrieved 17 December 2020, from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-55299779 Â
- Deley, T., & Dubois, E. (2020). Assessing Trust Versus Reliance for Technology Platforms by Systematic Literature Review. Social Media+ Society, 6(2), 2056305120913883.Â
- Foer, F. (2017). Facebookâs war on free will. Retrieved 17 December 2020, from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/sep/19/facebooks-war-on-free-will?CMP=share_btn_tw Â
- Gamaleri, G. (2019). Media ecology, Neil Postmanâs legacy: Mapping media ecology. Introduction to the field, by Dennis G. Cali. Church, Communication and Culture, 4(2), 238â244. https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2019.1616585Â
- Herhold, K. (2018). How people use social media in 2018. Retrieved 17 December 2020, from https://themanifest.com/social-media/how-people-use-social-media-2018#:~:text=%E2%80%9CIt’s%20how%20people%20communicate%2C%20look,do%2C%20and%20check%20the%20news Â
- Hern, A. (2020). Google suffers global outage with Gmail, YouTube and majority of services affected. Retrieved 2 January 2021, from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/dec/14/google-suffers-worldwide-outage-with-gmail-youtube-and-other-services-down
- Vigar-Ellis, B. (2014). Smartphone Applications – Idea sourcing, and app development: Implications for firms. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 17(3), 232â248. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v17i3.492Â








A print advert that received a vast amount of complaints was Protein Worldâs âare you beach body ready?â, featuring a photo of a slim model in a small bikini, as well as the weight loss pills collection they were promoting. The ad suggests that people reading are not in shape like the model in the advert is, and then follows up with a photo of the weight loss pills as if to say consumers need to buy these for them to be ready for summer. While this doesnât necessarily connect with social class, it does with gender. This advert received many complaints due to the objectification of women and addressing how women should look. Referring to my literature review, Carilli and Campbell (2005) argue women play a crucial role in advertising. It encourages women to see themselves as âmerchandisesâ as an object. This links to the advert as the model is selling an image and making people feel as though they need to look like this. It defines this body image to be the norm rather than showing diversity for all body types.

Women are also represented as stay at home mums in multiple cleaning adverts, such as the ones shown above. Flick (1987) states âadvertisements only give a partial view of women, and that they feature women in stereotyped situationsâ (Flick, 1987). Furthermore, the Advertising Standards Authority performed some research, finding 35% of women in 1990 were âdeeply concerned with the way women are portrayed in advertising.â This concern was also found in the research covering TV advertising by J. Walter Thompson (1986), which found women to be particularly critical of advertisements for cleaning products which âexaggerate the importance of household chores or suggest that house- wives are only (or especially) concerned with getting things cleaner, whiter, softer, or fresher.â Also, these cleaning adverts represent the working class a lot more than they would upper class due to the stereotype of rich people having their own cleaners rather than doing it themselves.






